[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home]
[By Thread]
[By Date]
Re: [xml-dev] Partyin' like it's 1999
On Wed, 2004-10-27 at 18:26, Bill de hÓra wrote:
> Elliotte Harold wrote:
>
> > Michael Champion wrote:
> >
> > uch like YAML or RNC is likely to be the ordinary-mortal
> >
> >> readable/writable serialization.
> >
> >
> > Maybe I'm weird, but I find RNG to be easier to read and follow than
> > RNC. It's certainly easier to write.
>
> I agree, but you're the only person I've heard of that that does.
> Most people I've seen that have the choice will use RNC.
As Mike C said
'Trouble is,
most things around us were designed by geniuses to be used by idiots;
XML was designed by very smart people to be used by themselves.'
Possible adjective there Bill?
Most 'smart' people?
Idiots like me still read XML easier.
I'm just glad we are in a majority, 'tis all.
N3 vs XML'ised RDF? same debate.... except
--
Regards DaveP.
XSLT&Docbook FAQ
http://www.dpawson.co.uk/xsl
|
