Re: [xml-dev] Ted Nelson's "XML is Evil"

• To: "Hunsberger, Peter" <Peter.Hunsberger@...>
• Subject: Re: [xml-dev] Ted Nelson's "XML is Evil"
• From: Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@...>
• Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 17:15:39 -0400
• Cc: Michael Kay <michael.h.kay@...>, "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <len.bullard@...>,Eric van der Vlist <vdv@...>, xml-dev@...
• In-reply-to: <1E0CC447E59C974CA5C7160D2A2854EC02FECEE4@...>
• References: <1E0CC447E59C974CA5C7160D2A2854EC02FECEE4@...>
• User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.8 (Windows/20040913)

Hunsberger, Peter wrote:

> Archive isn't an isolated capability.  Archive implies capability for
> usage.  Usage implies a mix of concerns. Does placing a inscribed stone
> tablet in a air tight iron box meet the requirements of archive if no
> one knows how to interpret the inscriptions on the stone tablet at any
> point in time?

Well, it worked great for the Rosetta Stone. Give people a bunch of 
labels, and they can often figure it out - even in languages they don't 
know, given enough time.

I think the topic at hand is inline markup. How could omitting the 
markup make it easier to understand the meaning and structure of the 
contents of a file?

Jonathan

• Prev by Date: RE: [xml-dev] Ted Nelson's "XML is Evil"
• Next by Date: Slightly off topic: geek dinner in Toronto
• Previous by thread: RE: [xml-dev] Ted Nelson's "XML is Evil"
• Next by thread: RE: [xml-dev] Ted Nelson's "XML is Evil"
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread