Re: [xml-dev] ISO and the Standards Golden Hammer (was Re: [xml-dev] You call that a standard?)

• To: Rich Salz <rsalz@...>
• Subject: Re: [xml-dev] ISO and the Standards Golden Hammer (was Re: [xml-dev] You call that a standard?)
• From: Alaric B Snell <alaric@...>
• Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2004 14:40:19 +0100
• Cc: "xml-dev@..." <xml-dev@...>
• In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.0404300912110.15041-100000@...>
• References: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.0404300912110.15041-100000@...>
• User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030704 Debian/1.4-1

Rich Salz wrote:

> So, can anyone point to ISO/ITU success in the computer (software) field?

X.500 and X.509!

And, more widely used, but not so visible to the more 
Web/Internet-focussed folks on this list, ASN.1.

And SDL is an ISO/ITU-T standard.

ABS

• Prev by Date: Re: [xml-dev] ISO and the Standards Golden Hammer (was Re: [xml-dev] You call that a standard?)
• Next by Date: RE: [xml-dev] ISO and the Standards Golden Hammer (was Re: [xml-dev] You call that a standard?)
• Previous by thread: Re: [xml-dev] ISO and the Standards Golden Hammer (was Re: [xml-dev] You call that a standard?)
• Next by thread: RE: [xml-dev] ISO and the Standards Golden Hammer (was Re: [xml-d ev] You call that a standard?)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread