Re: [xml-dev] XUL Standardization: Lessons from the RSS Civil War

• To: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@...>
• Subject: Re: [xml-dev] XUL Standardization: Lessons from the RSS Civil War
• From: John Cowan <jcowan@...>
• Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2003 15:09:19 -0400
• Cc: "'Tim Bray'" <tbray@...>, "'danny666@...'" <danny666@...>, xml-dev@...
• In-reply-to: <15725CF6AFE2F34DB8A5B4770B7334EE022DC4CA@...>
• References: <15725CF6AFE2F34DB8A5B4770B7334EE022DC4CA@...>
• User-agent: Mutt/1.4.1i

Bullard, Claude L (Len) scripsit:

> Umm... isn't that pretty much what the SGML ERB did?
> Many could propose but only the self-selected group 
> could dispose and decide.  ISO had the copyrights for 
> ISO 8879, but XML was created as a subset and the 
> normative reference maintained.  

Umm, what normative reference?  XML 1.0 has an *informative*
reference to ISO 8879.  The normative references are about URIs,
language tags, and Unicode.

-- 
John Cowan  www.ccil.org/~cowan  www.reutershealth.com  jcowan@...
All "isms" should be "wasms".   --Abbie

• Prev by Date: RE: [xml-dev] XML-based Automation (Was: Zen or Games?)
• Next by Date: [xml-dev] Lessons from the RSS Civil War: The Circle Of Life
• Previous by thread: RE: [xml-dev] XUL Standardization: Lessons from the RSS Civil War
• Next by thread: RE: [xml-dev] XUL Standardization: Lessons from the RSS Civil War
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread